‘I’d Rather Become the Technology’: Self- Preservation and the Dilemma of Trusting Technologies

Authors

  • Vardaan Nayar Indian Institute of Technology, Gandhinagar, India.

Abstract

This paper argues that posthuman portrayals of technology as a means to solve humanity’s problems ultimately fail because the technology’s performance is unreliable. The artefact almost always fails the objectives prescribed and envisioned by the creator. From the golem to K in Blade Runner, there is always an ultimate release or betrayal in which the artefact strays from its operations, revealing a disconnect between the technology’s own intentionality and self-preservation and the developer’s objectives. The paper thus traces media representations of posthuman technologies and two real-life examples to argue that, given a lack of trust in a technological “other”, the cyborg exists as a way to retain human control while gaining the advantages afforded by technological augmentation. However, while arguing that humans are the more reliable technology, this paper does not revert to the romantic ideas postulated by phenomenological thinkers. Rather, by adopting the postphenomenological  concept of cyborg relations, the paper argues that the cyborg exists, not only as a critique of 20th-century dominion over women and a transhumanist ideal, but also as a natural consequence of trusting technology and the inevitable disappointment that follows.

Keywords

Trust, Cyborg Body, Posthumanism, Media Analysis, Philosophy of Technology, Trusting Technology

References

Amodei, Dario, and Jack Clark. “Faulty Reward Functions in the Wild,” February 14, 2024. https://openai.com/index/faulty-reward-functions/.

Aristotle, William David Ross, and Lesley Brown. The Nicomachean Ethics. Ed. Rev. Oxford World’s Classics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009.

Bassett, Debra. “Digital Afterlives: From Social Media Platforms to Thanabots and Beyond.” In 200 Years After Frankenstein, Vol. 16. Death and Anti-Death, 2018.

Blade Runner 2049. Science Fiction. Warner Bros., 2017.

Bryson, Joanna J. “Robots Should Be Slaves.” In Natural Language Processing, edited by Yorick Wilks, 8:63–74. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company, 2010. https://doi.org/10.1075/nlp.8.11bry.

Davis, Fred D. “A TECHNOLOGY ACCEPTANCE MODEL FOR EMPIRICALLY TESTING NEW END-USER INFORMATION SYSTEMS: THEORY AND RESULTS.” Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 1985.

Distel, Bettina, Katherine M Engelke, and Sydney Querfurth. “Trusting Me, Trusting You - Trusting Technology? A Multidisciplinary Analysis to Uncover the Status Quo of Research on Trust in Technology,” 2021.

Han, Byung-Chul. The Transparency Society. Stanford (Calif.): Stanford Briefs, 2015.

Hardré, Patricia L. “When, How, and Why Do We Trust Technology Too Much?” In Emotions, Technology, and Behaviors, 85–106. Elsevier, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-801873-6.00005-4.

Hayles, N. Katherine. How We Became Posthuman: Virtual Bodies in Cybernetics, Literature, and Informatics. Chicago, Ill: University of Chicago Press, 1999.

Hilpinen, Risto. “Artifact,” January 5, 1999. https://plato.stanford.edu/archivES/FALL2017/entries/artifact/.

Ihde, Don, ed. Technology and the Lifeworld: From Garden to Earth. Indiana Series in the Philosophy of Technology. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 2010.

Itoh, Makoto. “A Model of Trust in Automation: Why Humans over-Trust?” In SICE Annual Conference (2011), 198–201, 2011. https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/6060601/.

Kee, Herbert W., and Robert E. Knox. “Conceptual and Methodological Considerations in the Study of Trust and Suspicion.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 14, no. 3 (September 1970): 357–66. https://doi.org/10.1177/002200277001400307.

Kiran, Asle H., and Peter-Paul Verbeek. “Trusting Our Selves to Technology.” Knowledge, Technology & Policy 23, no. 3–4 (December 2010): 409–27. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12130-010-9123-7.

LaGrandeur, Kevin. “Androids and the Posthuman in Television and Film.” In The Palgrave Handbook of Posthumanism in Film and Television, edited by Michael Hauskeller, Thomas D. Philbeck, and Curtis D. Carbonell, 111–19. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137430328_12.

Li, Xin, Traci J. Hess, and Joseph S. Valacich. “Why Do We Trust New Technology? A Study of Initial Trust Formation with Organizational Information Systems.” The Journal of Strategic Information Systems 17, no. 1 (March 2008): 39–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsis.2008.01.001.

Manders-Huits, Noëmi. “Moral Responsibility and IT for Human Enhancement.” In Proceedings of the 2006 ACM Symposium on Applied Computing, 267–71. Dijon France: ACM, 2006. https://doi.org/10.1145/1141277.1141340.

Marangunić, Nikola, and Andrina Granić. “Technology Acceptance Model: A Literature Review from 1986 to 2013.” Universal Access in the Information Society 14, no. 1 (March 2015): 81–95. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-014-0348-1.

Marshall University, Nancy Lankton, D. Harrison McKnight, Michigan State University, John Tripp, and Baylor University. “Technology, Humanness, and Trust: Rethinking Trust in Technology.” Journal of the Association for Information Systems 16, no. 10 (October 2015): 880–918. https://doi.org/10.17705/1jais.00411.

Maturana, Humberto R., and Gerda Verden-Zöller. The Origin of Humanness in the Biology of Love. Imprint Academic, 2008.

Nickel, Philip J. “Trust in Technological Systems.” In Norms in Technology, edited by Marc J. De Vries, Sven Ove Hansson, and Anthonie W.M. Meijers, 9:223–37. Philosophy of Engineering and Technology. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-5243-6_14.

Rousseau, Denise M., Sim B. Sitkin, Ronald S. Burt, and Colin Camerer. “Not So Different After All: A Cross-Discipline View Of Trust.” Academy of Management Review 23, no. 3 (July 1998): 393–404. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1998.926617.

Schoorman, David F., Roger C. Mayer, and James H. Davis. “Organizational Trust: Philosophical Perspectives and Conceptual Definitions.” The Academy of Management Review 21, no. 2 (1996): 337–40.

Taddeo, Mariarosaria. “Trusting Digital Technologies Correctly.” Minds and Machines 27, no. 4 (December 2017): 565–68. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11023-017-9450-5.

Verbeek, Peter-Paul. “Cyborg Intentionality: Rethinking the Phenomenology of Human–Technology Relations.” Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 7, no. 3 (September 2008): 387–95. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11097-008-9099-x.

Welch, Mary. “Rethinking Relationship Management: Exploring the Dimension of Trust.” Journal of Communication Management 10, no. 2 (April 1, 2006): 138–55. https://doi.org/10.1108/13632540610664706.

Xu, Jin. “Overtrust of Robots in High-Risk Scenarios.” In Proceedings of the 2018 AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society, 390–91. New Orleans, LA, USA: ACM, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1145/3278721.3278786.

Downloads

Published

15-05-2026

How to Cite

Nayar, V. (2026). ‘I’d Rather Become the Technology’: Self- Preservation and the Dilemma of Trusting Technologies. Digital Humanities Intersections, 1(1). Retrieved from https://dhi.iiti.ac.in/index.php/dhjournal/article/view/17

Issue

Section

Articles